penpusher: (ABC)
As we are on the verge of a new presidential administration in the United States, many people are concerned, even fearful about what the look, the feel, the tenet of this next chapter of the American story will resemble. To me, a television trivia expert, the answer is very clear. It’s…

It's... it's... )
penpusher: (Trump)
I'd like for you to say hello to the new Commander in Chief, to the new leader of the Free World, to the new President of the United States. His name is Donald J. Trump.

I know a lot of you are happy to meet the new boss, and I know that some of you are wondering just how he got the position. Let's review.

We had a black man as president for the previous eight years. This did not sit well with certain members of the opposition party.

I know that there will be a call stating that the fact that Barack Obama was black has nothing to do with it; that it was his policies that were disliked and dismissed. But there really was a movement to discredit him for who he was, and one of the biggest mouthpieces of that movement was Donald Trump.

See, Trump constantly stated that he didn't believe that President Obama was a "natural born American," a requirement for anyone seeking the office of President, and he continued to make the claim that not only was POTUS not born in the US, but that he was Muslim as well. Clearly, a kind of wedge was being driven into the collective consciousness about who this man was. This point cannot be underestimated. If you readily claim the person who is leading the country has a massive stake in it failing, that suggests a content of character issue, not a failed policy maker.

Eventually, it was time to see who was willing to run for the office and Trump was one of the people who chose to enter the field on the Republican side, this though he was a registered Democrat. It was a very crowded group with people from various parts of the country, some old familiar names, some up and coming politicians, even a brain surgeon, if you can believe it.

Meanwhile, on the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton was the most likely candidate. She had run and lost to Obama in 2008, then became his Secretary of State in 2012. Her problem was she had no competition and that made her both the prohibitive choice almost before she announced, but it meant that the GOP could start to prepare their approach for how they planned to attack and dismantle her.

Enter Bernie Sanders.

Sanders was a surprise and a force that, like Trump, came from outside of the typical political channels. He was an independent who joined the Democrats and started to travel to get his message out there, one of inclusion, of thought, of caring.

Sanders made a point not to attack Clinton through the bulk of the primary season. But he got a movement going, a groundswell for the Democratic "outsider" view, similarly as the GOP started to support Trump with his campaign. But everyone on the Republican side attacked the policies of Obama and Clinton, presenting at least that common thought for all of the baker's dozen of candidates. They united to pound Hillary for anything and everything they could think of, whether it was accurate or not.

The problem is in politics as usual and in the concept that politicians are, for the most part, corrupt. Both Sanders and Trump carried that message along with them as their popularity grew. This did no favors for Hillary Clinton, who was still dealing with the question of how she used her private server for what were potentially classified emails, possibly putting the country at risk for allowing secrets to fall into the hands of our enemies.

Never mind that Trump continually said and did things that would have taken down any other candidate. Never mind that Trump constantly made statements that contradicted himself. Never mind that Trump never actually stated anything he would do as President. Yes, he said he would build a wall on the Mexican border and have Mexico pay for it. But 1) there already is a wall on the Mexican/US border. And 2) that isn't a policy that the president can actually enact. And that was typical of everything Trump said during the run up to the Republican National Convention. He literally gave no one any information about what a Trump presidency would look like, what it would focus on, how it would function, and what it would be about.

"It'll be great" or "Watch and see" were typical phrases he would shout at reporters when they asked about these points. Why no one focused on the fact that Trump said nothing real or realistic about his concept of what the office was about is clearly an issue that was overlooked by the media. I don't recall hearing anyone say that they didn't feel Trump understood what the Executive branch was actually about. Instead, focus was on the fistfights and the anger at his rallies, the constant mantra of "Let's Make America Great Again," and zoomed in close on the next outrageous comment from the candidate's mouth, be it against a physically challenged journalist, a female opponent's face, or some media outlet or business he felt slighted him. It truly was the definition of the term "political circus."

Come election night, with the polls showing Hillary having a 3 point lead, the voting did not go that way, with Trump winning pretty much the entirety of the center of the country and the south, Hillary winning the West Coast and the Northeast with a few other states included. Too close to call was the official term, but everything seemed to tilt toward The Donald.

What does this mean? There is a new shift in how America sees itself and how it plans to move forward on the world stage. Diplomacy will become a meaningless word. Women's rights, both in the bedroom and in the military, will likely be stripped away, as Trump stated he is pro-life and anti-women in military positions. The Affordable Health Care act will likely be destroyed, with nothing to replace it for more than 20 million Americans. And with the help of the Republican Congress and the Republican leaning Supreme Court, we could see a repeal of the equality of marriage laws, permitting gay people their basic human rights to love and wed who they choose.

Clearly this was a "take back the country" message being sent from people who felt minorities, women, the LGBTQ community, and anyone with little or no power to do anything in this land, were getting a little bit out of control, a little bit too cozy and comfortable. Time to put you all back in your place. There will be no more images of the White House bathed in a rainbow. There will be no more entertaining the thought that climate change might be a thing. This is the end of tolerance. This is the rise of political incorrectness.

Meet the new boss... nothing like the old boss.

This thinkpost was written for LJ Idol X, using the prompt "Introduction"
penpusher: (Pen)
I'm continuing the examination of Jona Olsson's essay titled "Detour-Spotting," designed to examine the various ways our potential discussion of race and racism in America is constantly getting derailed.

The interesting thing about examining racism through this essay is how even the best intentions of people (especially white people, like Ms. Olsson) who truly want to help end racism can be blocked by the various elements on this list. The discussion changes and once that happens, nothing happens. That's why this is called "Detour-Spotting." We are looking at the ways we detour away from the topic of race in America, preventing the discussion and stopping any progress.

Today's detour was too long to fit into my title.

2) The Rugged Individual, the Level Playing Field and the Bootstrap Theory

“America is the land of opportunity, built by rugged individuals, where anyone with grit can succeed if they just pull up hard enough on their bootstraps.”

Reality Check and Consequence

These are three of the crown jewels of U. S. social propaganda. They have allowed generation after generation to say, “If you succeed, you did that, but if you fail, or if you’re poor, that’s your fault.” Belief in this propaganda is founded in a total denial of the impact of either oppression or privilege on any person’s chance for success.

Attacks on programs like affirmative action find rationalization in the belief that the playing field is now level, that is, that every individual, regardless of color (or gender or disability, etc.) has the same access to the rights, benefits and responsibilities of the society. The rationalization continues: since slavery is ended and people of color have civil rights, the playing field has now been leveled. It follows then, that there is no reason for a person of color to “fail” (whether manifested in low SAT scores or small numbers in management positions) EXCEPT individual character flaws or cultural inadequacies. This form of denial asserts that such “failures” could have no roots in racism and internalized racism.

The consequences include “justified” victim blaming, and denial of the daily impact of generations of institutionalized racism and white privilege.


This is a harsh one but a really common attitude from many white Americans, and you could see a lot of this from the Republican side of the aisle.

Yes, laws have changed. We no longer have Jim Crow. That ended in 1964. But we still have racism. And despite the fact that laws help, people's attitudes, assumptions and stances on people who are not like them continue to perpetuate the same kinds of reactions and responses.

Clearly, this is a method of ignoring the problems we need to be talking about, openly and honestly. Real estate agents will still be able to see the people who want to buy that property. Bankers can still note who is asking for a business loan.

What is really difficult to deal with is the fact that in the poorest parts of our country (not necessarily all that poor because many of them are couched within some of our most successful cities) no help has been offered to improve neighborhoods, infrastructure, or to provide people with support. Flint, Michigan is a great example of this. We haven't really heard any news about Flint in recent weeks. Yes, there have been a series of shootings and terrorist acts to divert our attention, but the truth is, nothing has changed there. People are still drinking from and bathing in bottled water. And there simply isn't enough bottled water available to do the job.

The fact that Flint legislators actively chose to send water from the Flint River, a body of water so polluted, even General Motors could find no use for it in the manufacture of its vehicles, into the sinks and bathtubs of people’s homes is beyond criminal. Children were poisoned, brain damaged, and there is no reversing that.

But the truth is, nothing has really changed there. People are still dealing with this continuing problem of not using indoor plumbing for anything but the toilet. How is THAT acceptable for this country?

In the United States, who you are matters a lot as far as what happens to you.

There are assumptions that are made, based on all of the various cues, and a decision to either help or ignore is made. We saw it during Hurricane Katrina. We saw it from the actions of key members of Congress against President Obama. But perhaps more tragically, we see it in every ghetto in every city in every state, every day.

The real difference between humans isn’t in the physical elements, the melanin content, the nose shape or the lip shape or the body type. The real difference between humans comes through the experiences we have had. This is what makes racism so horrific and tragic and makes the bad things we constantly talk about occur. Remove the experience of racism from everyone’s lives and suddenly, we have that level playing field. Schools are not prisons with teachers that are simply babysitting. People can get good paying jobs and earn a living. Poverty can start to erode. Crime, especially violent crime, can start to diminish.

But that requires the desire to actually make that happen, which, if we’re being honest, isn’t a very strong want from the people in charge.

I don’t want to get too far afield from the topic of this segment. There will be other times we can double back to some of these issues.

The point being made on this detour is that by doing the hard work, people can succeed, no matter who they are. And that’s the fallacy. Some people can succeed, and, as I pointed out in my essay about racism being an addiction, many black people who do become successful have done so because they received support from the system. They had a powerful white advocate that helped at a good moment or they had a lighter skin tone that wasn’t as offensive, or they had a charming personality or some other attractive element that made them “less threatening” to white folks who might have blocked their path.

I know that sounds like a hollow accusation. I know that sounds like blaming a non-existent entity for an individual's troubles. And I know that those thoughts are why any criticism of this "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" concept are usually rejected out of hand by many white people. They aren't aware of racism, what impact it has and how it upends many people who have every desire to do the work but can't because that option is not available.

Conversely, if you look at the easy path to success of many white folks in the nation, it's simply a matter of inheritance - getting money from their wealthy parents who got it from their parents and so on, all the way back to the slave trade days. A person like Donald Trump would not be on the world stage if he didn't have a father who gave him his start. That's privilege. Very few black people have that kind of experience. So, in the case of any black person's success, it really needs to be examined in a different way.

The problem with looking at any “success story” in the case of black Americans is that those are things that can never be recreated. There is no "system" of success. You can’t follow Oprah’s path to brilliance. You won’t be able to duplicate Tyler Perry’s career. And really, that’s the biggest issue. Finding a way into success when so many doors are closed or worse, locked, would be challenging for anyone. But what if you live in an unsafe neighborhood? What if you don’t get enough to eat on a daily basis? What if you are constantly dealing with police harassment or being offered drugs or alcohol? It's these extra "challenges" that create an unfair circumstance for many black citizens of this country and create the underclass that the well-to-do are so ready to mock, ridicule or perhaps worst of all, ignore.

Yes, some will still succeed. There are always exceptions to the rule that escape their life circumstances, just as surely as there are people who win huge jackpots at a Las Vegas Casino. But that opportunity is not available to all. And when it comes to racism, it’s about ALL. It’s about making things fair for everyone to have a good life, not just a random handful.

If that concept doesn’t make sense to you, that’s okay. We’re just getting started.

Previous thinkposts in this series:
1. Day One - "I'm Colorblind"

A reminder: because of the sensitive nature of the subject, comments directly to this and all previous and future essays in this series are screened. Thank you.
penpusher: (Flag)
Just about nine months ago, I wrote a thinkpost called Why "President Trump" Is NOT As Far-Fetched As You Think", which outlined the basics of why a nonsensical candidate who had no political experience of any kind could wind up being the Republican Nominee for President during this election cycle.

At the time I wrote that piece... )
penpusher: (DemReps)
It was a big political ball o' wax these past 7 days, what with President Obama giving his final State of the Union address, The Republicans having their... 84th? Debate and the Democrats gathering to hash and hashtag it out with their own debate.

I want to make a brief note of pride that the first "social media" vlogger that asked a question of the Democrats was [livejournal.com profile] chescaleigh, who was a guest on my [livejournal.com profile] talk_show blog way, way, way back in the day. Since then, she has exploded on YouTube, does a web series for MTV called "Decoded" and has been making appearances on everything from Anderson Cooper to The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore. In some ways I feel like I discovered her, but she would have (and really did happen) without me!

But, let's start with the Dems... )
penpusher: (Flag)


This is a challenge, since there's a lot going on, but is there a phrase or sentence that really sums up this photograph?

Profile

penpusher: (Default)
penpusher

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
2223 2425262728
293031    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 24th, 2025 06:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios